<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Jangro - Latest Comments in Disqus Wordpress Integration: Javascript vs API</title><link>http://jangro.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:09:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Disqus Wordpress Integration: Javascript vs API</title><link>http://www.jangro.com/a/2008/05/14/disqus-wordpress-integration-javascript-vs-api/#comment-517240</link><description>'In my opinion, comments are the life-blood of an active blog and not only do they show readers that there’s a vibrant community behind a blog, it gives search engines more to work with.'&lt;br&gt;Agree with this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:09:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus Wordpress Integration: Javascript vs API</title><link>http://www.jangro.com/a/2008/05/14/disqus-wordpress-integration-javascript-vs-api/#comment-492679</link><description>Looks cool, but I'm getting worried about putting yet another WP plugin on my site. &lt;a href="http://www.psychicchatsonline.net&gt;Psychic Chat Online&lt;/a&gt; already has a homepage averaging almost 400k which will apparently take 100seconds on a 56k modem. Something I just found out. I don't know tho, i'm definitely rambling off topic. Duplicate content sucks, how is everyone else finding the plugin so far?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tara Nigma</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:50:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus Wordpress Integration: Javascript vs API</title><link>http://www.jangro.com/a/2008/05/14/disqus-wordpress-integration-javascript-vs-api/#comment-487939</link><description>Nice. good news Sam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;C'mon Daniel, spill it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jangro</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 01:21:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus Wordpress Integration: Javascript vs API</title><link>http://www.jangro.com/a/2008/05/14/disqus-wordpress-integration-javascript-vs-api/#comment-487918</link><description>Just saw this on Twitter from Disqus' @danielha:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"danielha: @duncanriley I agree. Looks like you're using the (outdated) API version. A new one is imminent"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">samharrelson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 01:12:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus Wordpress Integration: Javascript vs API</title><link>http://www.jangro.com/a/2008/05/14/disqus-wordpress-integration-javascript-vs-api/#comment-485493</link><description>I prefer API than Javascript. You have an excellent post here, very informative</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 05:29:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus Wordpress Integration: Javascript vs API</title><link>http://www.jangro.com/a/2008/05/14/disqus-wordpress-integration-javascript-vs-api/#comment-481051</link><description>yea some good discussion might bring up a whole new insight to a article.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">journey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:09:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus Wordpress Integration: Javascript vs API</title><link>http://www.jangro.com/a/2008/05/14/disqus-wordpress-integration-javascript-vs-api/#comment-479282</link><description>I agree with you that comments are getting more important these days. Thats why its important to present your article in such that it generates discussion, rather than just allow the readers to just take and not give.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VeraBradley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:46:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus Wordpress Integration: Javascript vs API</title><link>http://www.jangro.com/a/2008/05/14/disqus-wordpress-integration-javascript-vs-api/#comment-463883</link><description>I share your concern over the duplicate content, Vlad, though I'm not overly concerned.  The actual blog post should help.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Disqus should give an option to put a noindex on their forum pages.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jangro</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus Wordpress Integration: Javascript vs API</title><link>http://www.jangro.com/a/2008/05/14/disqus-wordpress-integration-javascript-vs-api/#comment-463850</link><description>Same here Scott,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am sticking to API version for now. At lest on the blogs that I care for the most. Countless times visitors find my blogs through a keyword found in the comments but not in the body of the posts. But there is another thing with API that concerns me- duplicate content penalties. If you have comments here and on your forum over at Disqus, who gets the duplicate penalty? I am not even sure if this is such and important issue, but I have been on the roll over the duplicate content recently. Google Webmaster tolls has been reporting duplicate content as far as metatags concerned - I believe titles, keywords and description. I have increased dramatically the SE rankings just eliminating those dupes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's too bad they don't update API version.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VladZablotskyy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:01:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>